Quality Assessment of Videos in Spanish Dealing with Renoureteral Lithiasis and Nephithic Colic in Youtube.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54212/27068048.v8i2.38Keywords:
Information quality, videos in Spanish, Renoureteral LithiasisAbstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Internet has changed access to medical information. However, we don´t know the quality of this information. We analyze the quality of content in YouTube for urinary lithiasis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A searched in YouTube was done using the keywords "renal lithiasis", "kidney stone" and "renal colic". Including only videos in Spanish. Two urologists classified them as: helpful (U), misleading (E), or personal experience (EP). We analyze other parameters such as; visits, duration, time, or origin.
RESULTS:147 videos were analyzed. 26.7% were considered U and 73.3% as E or EP. The mean duration of the videos was 300 seconds (SD + -4.3) with no significant differences between useful and non-useful videos (p = 0. 66). U did not present a higher rate of visits per day than non-useful ones (E, EP) (P = 0.04). Group U presented a mean of 160.23 visits / day (v / d) (SD 701.3) compared to E 239.93v / d (SD 57.1) or EP 48.84 v / d (SD 78.152).The videos came from independent users (41.9%). In group U, the majority came from health education programs (27%). We don’t found statistically significant difference in reproduction or in the number of visits / day in group U with respect to E or EP p = 0.666 for reproductions and p = 0.106 for (v / d)
CONCLUSIONS: 26.3% of the information published on YouTube about renal lithiasis in Spanish was considered useful. Useful videos were not played more times than E or EP p = 0.666.
Downloads
References
McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling. 2006;63(1-2):24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006
Olmo Ruiz M, Lama Paniego J.R, Cienfuegos Belmonte I , y cols. Profile of the urologic patient who uses the internet as a source of medical information . Libro de resúmenes. LXXXI Congreso Nacional de Urología. Toledo 2016.Resumen n: P-246
Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle R. Social Internet Sites as a Source of Public Health Information. Dermatologic Clinics. 2009;27(2):133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2008.11.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2008.11.010
Ache K , Wallace L. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(4):389-392.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.029
Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, y cols. YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2481. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.21.2482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.21.2482
Freeman B, Chapman S. Is "YouTube" telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco Control. 2007;16(3):207-210. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.020024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.020024
Eglash A. Website Review. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2009;4(3):185-185. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2009.9989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2009.9989
Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M y cols. YouTube As a Source of Information on the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010;38(3):e1-e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007
Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, y cols. YouTube as a Source of Information on Kidney Stone Disease. Urology. 2011;77(3):558-562.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536
Hiatt R, Dales L, Friedman G, y cols. Frequency of urolithiasis in a prepaid medical care program. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1982;115(2):255-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113297
Mota P, Carvalho N, Carvalho-Dias E, João Costa M, Correia-Pinto J, Lima E.
Video-Based Surgical Learning: Improving Trainee Education and Preparation for
Surgery. J Surg Educ. 2018 May - Jun;75(3):828-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.027
Serinken M, Eken C, Erdemir F,y cols.The reliability of national videos related to the kidney stones on YouTube.Türk ÜrolojiDergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology.2016;42(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2016.29567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2016.29567
Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, y cols. Medical information on the Internet : quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114 (6):655-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.048
Larouche M, Stothers L, Geoffrion R y cols. Mid-YouTube Slings: A Systematic Appraisal pf Social Media on Information Quality, Surgical Content and Bias about Mid-urethral Slings. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015;22(3):S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.161
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 J.R Lama Paniego, C. García-Sánchez, C. Corchuelo-Maillo, E. Arguelles-Salido, P. Campoy-Martínez, R.A. Medina-López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
